![]() ![]() ExpressVPN kept a few more things like the version of the app we used, when we connected in terms of days, and other information about our usage that we didn’t appreciate, necessarily. However, Surfshark was particularly strict, only keeping our password, encrypted, anonymous app diagnostics, our email addresses and our payment information. Privacy policy: Both ExpressVPN and Surfshark are really solid when it comes to their data logging policies, not keeping any information about our web activity, IP addresses, usage sessions, bandwidth, etc. ![]() With ExpressVPN, on the other hand, we were capped at five devices at a time, which, while that was usually enough for us, won’t be enough for everyone. Simultaneous connections: We connected as many devices as we wanted to Surfshark, which makes its low price seem even better.1 Of course, you should do a speed test without either VPN connected as a control, while keeping in mind average Internet speeds around the world. If you want to do a speed test on your own, keep in mind that the global average download speed is around 34 Mbps, the upload speed is around 11 Mbps, and latency is around 41 ms. But as it turned out, ExpressVPN was much faster on both, particularly Windows Surfshark and Windows were about as compatible as oil and water, actually. Speed: Our readers use different types of devices, so to accommodate that, we tested out ExpressVPN and Surfshark on Mac and Windows computers.While on the one hand there is a lot of history there, it could very well be that ExpressVPN will continue to be run independently within a conglomerate that is now running things by the rules, as ExpressVPN claims.Total number of compatible devices and browser extensions The second issue concerns privacy and whether or not you trust ExpressVPN after its acquisition by Kape Technologies. You can’t argue with that big a price difference, especially not if you’re looking for a VPN on a budget. The first is its much higher price: Surfshark is a lot cheaper and thus a much better choice for people on a budget. There are, however, two issues to contend with. It’s more secure out of the gate, gets into Netflix, and is a lot faster. In many ways, ExpressVPN is the better VPN, by far. Although these tweaks won’t be useful for everybody-or even just a minority of users-they’re enough to give this round to ExpressVPN, even if just by a hair. There’s a lot of overlap between the two server lists (here are ExpressVPN’s and Surfshark’s official lists), as you can imagine. Overall, ExpressVPN seems to be the better pick if you need someplace out of the way-like Kyrgyzstan-while Surfshark has servers in some unexpected places like the United Arab Emirates and the Russian Federation-where VPNs aren’t always legal.įor example, ExpressVPN lets you set up split tunneling, customize your kill switch settings, and adjust a few other small preferences. ExpressVPN offers around 3,000 servers in over 90 countries-some of them exotic locations like Kyrgyzstan-while Surfshark has 3,200 servers in about 65 countries, most of them in Europe and North America. If you’re looking for a server in a specific country, both services may be worth looking into. So far, no other VPN can beat ExpressVPN for another example read our NordVPN vs ExpressVPN article. When we stay closer to home, this loss can be as low as 10 or 20 percent. ![]() In contrast, every test we run with ExpressVPN is just good: even when connecting to a server halfway across the world we only see a decrease of roughly 50 percent. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |